Do we need more troops in Iraq?

Today, I’ve been analyzing the reply of President Bush to the democrats of the House. Basically, it can be resumed “by the like”:

Us, Americans need to keep the Iraq’sdemocracy (I can’t stop laughing) in a healthy state.

As a result of the demo-bill that reduces dramatically the budget for the Iraq thing, our troops will return before what was scheduled based on the wise advice submitted to Bush BY THE ARMY, NAVY AND AIR FORCE top officers.

America needs to enforce the fight against terrorism ALL OVER THE WORLD, to ensure that peace and democracy beats out the fears that S-11 brought to our lives.

I don’t know if it’s only my own personal perception, but from my narrow and humble point of view the only answer that deserves the latter statements would drive the whole Administration straight towards the urgent quest for an emergency rhinoplasty nose job, rethorically speaking, of course.

In fact, what seems to be the ultimate historical truth is that the US troops invasions don’t bring democracy and stability to the target nations. Vietnam is the probably the best example of why the politics of “isolationism” followed religiously by the Demo’s serve better to the purpose of avoiding the terrorism outbreaks. It’s just as simple as this, you keep your nose away from my yard, and I will keep my feet out of yours. Let’s SAY “NO” TO THE WAR.


Aproveche para dejarnos su comentario y enriquecer la discusión.

Escriba un comentario: